MASVS provides a shared requirements framework that extends beyond reverse-engineering resistance. Data, identity, networking and platform interactions belong in the same assessment.
Evaluation approach
Map data flows and trust boundaries first. Select applicable requirements and assign each a design decision, test method and owner. RASP addresses some runtime risks but cannot satisfy the entire standard alone.
Application example
A payment application's control matrix may use Keychain or Keystore for local data, TLS configuration for networking and RASP evaluation for tamper resistance. Attach separate evidence to each requirement rather than closing every row with one product name.
Limits and considerations
Referencing MASVS is not an OWASP product certification. Do not assume that old control identifiers map unchanged to a newer document.
Checks and decisions
- Record the MASVS version
- Explain exclusions
- Link controls to executed tests
Do not close an unmet requirement merely because RASP is present. Keep risk acceptance and compensating controls visible.
Sources
The primary references above provide the technical basis. Example workflows and evaluation suggestions are this publication’s explanations, not independent test results for a particular product.