Define the platform and code scope of the proposed Digital.ai product. The product-family name alone does not establish protection of every application component.
Evaluation approach
The vendor integrates security controls into development and build workflows. Review support for each language, platform and protection component used.
Application example
When managing several enterprise applications under a policy family, record application-specific exceptions and release differences.
Limits and considerations
An older product name or technical article may not describe the current package's scope.
A coverage matrix for multiple applications
Enterprise applications may use different languages and release schedules. Keep each application's protection settings and test results separate, even within one product family. Central policy must not obscure local exceptions.
Map language support, compiler compatibility and incident integration to the application inventory. Distinguish contracted features from those actually enabled. Ask how support for new platform releases is delivered and which team owns failures.
Checks and decisions
- Request current product scope
- Verify language support
- Test monitoring integration
Assess centralized management alongside application-specific control requirements.
Sources
The primary references above provide the technical basis. Example workflows and evaluation suggestions are this publication’s explanations, not independent test results for a particular product.