Android and iOS

Build or buy RASP controls?

Protection designed for real workflows, from banking to field operations.

Industry use cases1 min readEditorial methods

Building and buying distribute maintenance responsibility differently. Platform changes, test capacity and response work make the decision broader than licensing.

Evaluation approach

Include maintenance, compatibility, telemetry and releases in the comparison. Separate business-specific controls from general environment checks. A mixed model may be appropriate.

Application example

Keep authorization and transaction binding in your own server while buying application hardening. Feed supplier signals into your risk engine so business decisions are not trapped inside one SDK.

Limits and considerations

A small internal check set is not equivalent to a broad protection product. Manage supplier dependency through contracts and a technical exit plan.

Checks and decisions

  • Estimate three-year maintenance effort
  • Separate control ownership
  • Plan migration and exit

Evaluate who will solve new-OS compatibility and false blocks, not only how easy the prototype is.

Sources

The primary references above provide the technical basis. Example workflows and evaluation suggestions are this publication’s explanations, not independent test results for a particular product.