Android and iOS

Investigating ANRs and crashes after RASP integration

Latency, availability, incident response and protection policies.

Production operations1 min readEditorial methods

New ANRs or crashes are not necessarily attack signals. Examine device cohorts, threads and SDK interactions to find the cause.

Evaluation approach

Compare stack traces, versions and device groups. Investigate main-thread blocking, locks and native-library compatibility.

Application example

A crash before a security event should be tracked as a technical defect rather than reported as a successful block.

Limits and considerations

Events increasing in the same release does not by itself prove causation.

Separate rejection from application failure

Expected transaction denial, crashes and Android ANRs are different outcomes. Even intentional termination can disrupt users, so define acceptance criteria in advance.

Associate crash reports with application and protection versions. Correct symbols or mapping files support diagnosis. Segment post-rule increases by device and flow before labeling them a general platform problem.

Checks and decisions

  • Match symbol files
  • Reproduce conditions
  • Use controlled comparisons

Restored user experience and verified protection are separate acceptance criteria.

Sources

The primary references above provide the technical basis. Example workflows and evaluation suggestions are this publication’s explanations, not independent test results for a particular product.