Production operations
Latency, availability, incident response and protection policies.
Rolling out application protection gradually
Enabling a new protection policy for everyone at once can amplify unknown compatibility problems. Plan measurement, stop conditions and rollback before rollout.
Read the guideUsing RASP observation mode
Observation mode helps reveal signal distributions and legitimate-user impact.
Read the guideCalibrating RASP risk thresholds
Thresholds should reflect your users and transactions. A supplier's example value may not represent normal behavior in your application.
Read the guideInvestigating RASP false positives
Blocking a legitimate user requires a dedicated investigation. Connect support records, policy versions and device context without collecting personal secrets.
Read the guideAn application protection event taxonomy
Consistent event classes help teams discuss the same conditions accurately. Detection, enforcement, service errors and uncertain outcomes require distinct records.
Read the guideSending RASP events to a SIEM
SIEM integration improves visibility without requiring unlimited duplication of raw data. Decide schema, context, access and retention together.
Read the guideA SOC runbook for application protection
A runbook defines who investigates an alert and which evidence they need. Relate mobile events to user transactions before applying broad device restrictions.
Read the guideResponding to RASP incidents
The appropriate response depends on impact. Account revocation, transaction restrictions, key rotation and user support serve different purposes.
Read the guideHigh availability for RASP verification
When verification becomes a critical dependency, continuity belongs in the security design. Failure policy matters alongside redundancy.
Read the guideRolling back RASP policies safely
Rollback should not mean disabling protection indefinitely. Record the previous version, temporary scope and reassessment conditions.
Read the guideSetting a RASP transaction latency budget
Measure protection delay through the user's completed task. Keep startup cost, network verification and critical-operation waiting distinct.
Read the guideEvaluating application protection battery use
Frequent checks can affect battery use through CPU work, networking and background activity. Test realistic usage cycles across device classes.
Read the guideRASP and application startup time
Protection can add startup work. Measure cold launch, return from background and readiness for the first sensitive operation separately.
Read the guideInvestigating ANRs and crashes after RASP integration
New ANRs or crashes are not necessarily attack signals. Examine device cohorts, threads and SDK interactions to find the cause.
Read the guideData minimization in RASP telemetry
Collect enough context to support decisions. More personal data does not automatically improve analysis; every field needs a clear purpose.
Read the guideRetention periods for RASP events
Set retention according to investigation needs and data impact. Include logs, backups and support exports in the lifecycle.
Read the guideUser support after a RASP block
Users who believe a block is mistaken need a safe support route. Investigations should not request passwords or live session credentials.
Read the guideVersioning RASP policies
Decisions cannot be explained without knowing which rule ran for which operation. Record policy versions, rollout times and rollback relationships.
Read the guideSLOs and service indicators for application protection
A security service must do more than appear available. Track verification latency, availability, false blocks and safely completed transactions together.
Read the guideExercising a RASP service outage
Test dependency failures before they happen. Exercises show how user flows and server policies behave under uncertainty.
Read the guideManaging RASP SDK upgrades
An SDK update can change detection coverage, data use and application behavior. Review release notes, final artifacts and regression results together.
Read the guideLearning from application protection incidents
Closing an incident may require more than adding a rule. Review design assumptions, monitoring gaps and support processes together.
Read the guideIntegrity of RASP test and incident evidence
Evidence is useful when its artifact identity and change history are known. Access controls, hashes and release relationships make investigations more dependable.
Read the guideApplication protection release acceptance checklist
Acceptance should verify security controls and legitimate user tasks together. Link the final signed package, support route and rollback plan to one release record.
Read the guideTotal cost of application protection ownership
License fees are only part of the investment. Device testing, integration, investigations, support and updates determine total ownership cost.
Read the guide